Home » California Gas Prices Set to Increase After CARB Vote

California Gas Prices Set to Increase After CARB Vote

by CC News
Contra Costa County Gas Prices

On Friday, the California Air Resources Board voted to revamp its climate change program which is estimated to increase gas prices as high as 65 cents.  The vote was 12-2 vote.

Ultimately, the changes require gasoline, diesel, and other fuels to meet higher standards for greenhouse gases.  It also tweaks how credits are awarded for lower carbon fuels.

On Saturday morning, the average gallon of gas in California costs $4.14 compared to the $3.09 national average. In Contra Costa County, the average is $4.60 per gallon.

California State Republicans released the following statement stating , the California Air Resources Board voted to update the Low Carbon Fuel Standard and increase gas prices. Despite estimates this vote could spike prices by another 65 cents a gallon and demands for more transparency from lawmakers, journalists and the public, the board approved the new regulation.

The vote to increase gas prices comes after Newsom’s special session on gas prices, where new regulations have caused refiners to consider pulling out of California.

“This is just the latest example of Newsom and his Democrat allies in the Legislature screwing working Californians with even higher costs,” said Assembly Republican Leader James Gallagher (Yuba City). “Californians have been clear: they cannot afford the higher gas prices this new rule will cause. Democrat politicians have stood in the way of every effort to stop this price spike – they will have to answer to their outraged constituents when gas prices jump yet again.”

Meanwhile, other statements from lawmakers

  • Assemblyman Tom Lackey (R-Palmdale): Gas prices will increase by as much as 67 cents per gallon if CARB approves this policy. I will be in person at tomorrow’s hearing to urge CARB to reject this proposal. The Governor should join me, not make splashy headlines about a special session that does nothing to lower gas prices.
  • Senator Brian W. Jones: The Air Resources Board’s 65-cent gas price hike is a direct assault on hardworking Californians. This evening’s vote is nothing short of blatant price gouging by the Newsom Administration. This unelected group of wealthy bureaucrats, handpicked and directed by Governor Newsom, is shamelessly increasing gas prices so Californians are forced into electric vehicles against their will. And conveniently, they pushed this costly regulation through right after the election, late at night, hoping no one would notice. Californians have had enough—we already pay the highest gas prices in the nation, and they are about to get much higher. It’s time to rein in CARB’s unchecked power, starting by revoking the federal waivers that allow them to do whatever they want, whenever they want without the consent of Californians who pay the price for their political agenda.

 


California Air Resource Board

CARB updates the Low Carbon Fuel Standard to increase access to cleaner fuels and zero-emission transportation options

SACRAMENTO — The California Air Resources Board today approved updates to the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) that channel global, national and local private sector investment towards increasing cleaner fuel and transportation options for consumers, accelerating the deployment of zero-emission infrastructure, and keeping the state on track to meet legislatively mandated air quality and climate targets.

The LCFS reduces air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions by setting a declining carbon intensity target for transportation fuels used in California; producers that don’t meet established benchmarks buy credits from those that do. This system has generated $4 billion in annual private sector investment toward a cleaner transportation sector. These investments provide multiple economic benefits to Californian consumers, including:

  • Increasing consumer choices, which drives transportation fuel price competition
  • Growing new industries and attracting investments that support jobs and strengthen communities
  • Reducing dependence on petroleum and the oil industry, thereby protecting consumers from its associated supply and cost volatility
  • Making electric vehicles more affordable
  • Expanding access to electric vehicle charging and hydrogen refueling infrastructure
  • Reducing the health impacts and health care costs associated with air pollution from fossil fuels

The updates set targets to reduce the carbon intensity of California’s transportation fuel pool by 30% by 2030 and by 90% by 2045. The amendments also increase support for zero-emissions infrastructure, including for medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, and make more transit agencies eligible to generate credits.

The LCFS has been very effective to date, reducing the carbon intensity of California’s fuel mix by almost 13% and displacing 70% of the diesel used in the state with cleaner alternatives. This has displaced 320 million metric tons CO2 of gasoline and diesel emissions since the Program’s inception. That’s an amount equivalent 85% of today’s annual statewide greenhouse gas emissions. The growth in the use of renewable fuel is powering needed emissions reductions in the transportation sector.

“The proposal approved today strikes a balance between reducing the environmental and health impacts of transportation fuel used in California and ensuring that low-carbon options are available as the state continues to work toward a zero-emissions future,” said CARB Chair Liane Randolph. “Today’s approval increases consumer options beyond petroleum, provides a roadmap for cleaner air, and leverages private sector investment and federal incentives to spur innovation to address climate change and pollution.”

The LCFS is designed to provide the most cost-effective path to support clean fuels and infrastructure. Affordability remains a key consideration for the Board, and it has directed staff to assess any impacts and potential mitigation from today’s adopted amendments on retail gasoline prices every six months and to submit an annual report beginning one year from the effective date of these amendments, and to collaborate with the California Energy Commission in that effort. The program currently limits the pass-through costs companies can shift to consumers by capping the price of credits that high-carbon-intensity fuel producing entities are required to purchase for compliance and allowing banking of credits bought at lower prices. Data from third party commodities markets experts shows the current LCFS pass through to California consumers is $0.10 per gallon of gasoline. This is consistent with the self-reported data by high-carbon-intensity fuel producers, which reflects an LCFS cost pass through to consumers of $0.08 to $0.10 per gallon of gasoline.

Supporting Californians

  • Making electric vehicles more affordable: “The LCFS has also provided hundreds of millions of dollars of beneficial credits and incentives supporting the build-out of EV charging infrastructure and vehicle rebates which lower the upfront costs for drivers,” said a representative from MN8 Energy, which produces renewable energy, in a letter submitted to CARB.
  • Expanding access to charging infrastructure: As of October 10, 2024, there have been a total of 71 hydrogen stations and 749 fast EV charger sites approved under the Hydrogen Refueling Infrastructure (HRI) and (Fast Charging Infrastructure) FCI provisions of LCFS, respectively.
  • Reducing health care costs associated with pollution from dirty fuels: CARB estimates $5 billion in savings from avoided health outcomes between 2024 and 2046.
  • Increasing consumer choices, which drives price competition: “By using market-based policies that ensure the best ideas succeed, we can also maximize impact by marshaling private capital to invest in climate solutions. Fortunately, California already has an excellent example of this kind of approach in the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS).”
  • Reducing dependence on the oil industry, thereby protecting consumers from its associated supply and cost volatility: The LCFS has displaced more than 30 billion gallons of petroleum fuel.

The LCFS sends long-term market signals to phase out combustion fuels and increase zero emission fuels and transportation options. The LCFS updates adopted by the Board were developed after a rigorous, years-long public rulemaking process that incorporated feedback received from interested parties. Updates include:

  • Providing billions of additional dollars to fund zero-emission vehicle charging and hydrogen fueling infrastructure, including new crediting opportunities for medium – and heavy-duty refueling infrastructure, to support implementation of California’s zero emission vehicle regulations.
  • Increasing incentives for infrastructure in low-income neighborhoods and remote locations and ensuring that historically underserved communities receive needed investment to reduce emissions and provide equitable access to a clean air future.
  • Phasing out avoided methane crediting associated with the use of biomethane used as a combustion fuel, but extending the use of biomethane for renewable hydrogen to align with goals outlined in the 2022 Scoping Plan – the state’s plan for reducing climate-warming emissions and reaching carbon neutrality.

Updated guardrails

The LCFS updates also include new guardrails to avoid land use changes resulting in potential loss of food production or deforestation. The majority of biomass-based diesel and sustainable aviation fuel in the LCFS has historically come from waste feedstocks, such as used cooking oil, animal fat and inedible distiller’s corn oil. To minimize potential land use issues, the program will require fuel producers track crop-based and forestry-based feedstocks to their point of origin. The LCFS will also require independent feedstock certification to ensure biomass-based diesel and sustainable aviation fuel feedstocks are not undermining natural carbon stocks. Palm-derived fuels are also explicitly prohibited from receiving credits.

Californians will benefit from these program updates in numerous ways, including:

  • As consumers increase their use of low carbon intensity fuels and more efficient vehicles, fuel costs per mile will be reduced by 42 percent – translating to savings of over $20 billion in fuel expenditures every year by 2045. For light-duty vehicles (cars, pickup trucks, sport utility vehicles, vans, and minivans) these fuel cost savings will be even more pronounced, cutting today’s costs to Californians by more than 50 percent.
  • The amount of LCFS proceeds invested in disadvantaged communities for clean fuel and transportation projects is estimated to be approximately $4.8 billion in the next decade.
  • Californians are expected to save almost $5 billion in health care costs by avoiding the impacts of air pollution.
  • The amendments will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 558 million metric tons, NOx by more than 25,500 tons and PM 2.5 by more than 4,200 tons between 2025 and 2045.

More Information

 

 


Previous Stories:

support


You may also like

13 comments

Jiveass honky November 9, 2024 - 8:50 am

12 appointed people telling you that you are gonna pay more because they say so. You have no vote in the matter. Oh , newsome appointed them, just saying.

Rich November 9, 2024 - 11:53 am

Again people keep voting these people and ideas back in without realizing the consequences that follow.

Dbrew November 9, 2024 - 12:09 pm

The carb ruling just broke my back. It will take me a few months but I’m out of here Don’t know what took me so long to leave

Dont be fooled November 9, 2024 - 5:43 pm

If people can afford 49er’s football tickets, Vegas trips, Trips to Disneyland, eating out; then they can afford to pay for gas. Don’t be fooled. Sporting events, concerts venues, and restaurant’s always look busy with Biden’s economy looking well and healthy.

Poor Man November 10, 2024 - 5:16 am

Newscum needs the money to fight Trump. Newscum thinks the WOKE people of California will elect him President. He went all in for the 8% of the WOKE society is on the bottom tier of income.

Jenny D Ruiz November 10, 2024 - 6:31 am

Another democrat deciding our fate. Newscum hasn’t opened his wallet at a gas line for years I’m sure.
The most uncaring politician for the people I’ve ever seen.

Jeff November 10, 2024 - 8:30 am

This is the prime example of how Sacramento has truly transformed into one giant Criminal Syndicate- and yet apparently the majority still votes for their own demise. The 5 out of 10 who bitch about how much gas and diesel is costing (and be prepared to pay 2 to 3 times as much) you only have to look in the mirror as the reason why. Politicians are price gouging- not oil companies. California is the most successful refined product entity in the world now.

Greg Granieri November 10, 2024 - 2:34 pm

Unreal how we can continue to get reamed at the gas pump. Newsom has got to go!!!!

Andrew Figgins November 11, 2024 - 1:41 am

Newsome needs to be thrown out of office . And everyone of these C.A.R.B. board members better start looking for a new career because they are going to lose their jobs .

kwame' November 11, 2024 - 9:11 am

Is this his reaction to the election? He didn’t like seeing so much red in his state so now he’s turning around and whipping the voters. The Boss-Man cometh.

TSG November 12, 2024 - 7:47 am

This is a tremendous cost to all of us. I have not seen anywhere what the benefit is. From this change of fuel, how much cleaner is the air going to get? How much reduction in emissions can we expect? What effect does that have on climate? I bet the reduction of emissions is less than 1% and hence irrelevant.

Ginger November 12, 2024 - 8:42 pm

Is this Newsome’s way to force California’s into electric vehicles while he’s allowing pg&e to jack up electricity prices? Explain to me how people should save money to buy EV’s when gas prices jump like this and paychecks stay the same? Also, why bother if plugging in your car at night is going to cost just as much as the new more environmentally friendly gas? Is anyone in Sacramento actually thinking this stuff through? Do they care about people making less than $100k? What happened to voting? They just force this crap on us???

MODERATE November 13, 2024 - 8:20 am

The voting problem is with California’s electorate. They keep re-electing progressive-liberal leftists instead of moderate and pragmatic centrists. California’s Democratic Party with its legislative supermajority has so gamed the system through jerrymandering and election “reforms” that it is difficult for moderates to even get nominated. What good is an election that pits one liberal Democrat vs. another? Tweedle-dee-de vs. Tweedle-de-dum. We need to overthrow the supermajority and reestablish a competitive two-party structure. It is only through that competition that the extremists on both ends are forced to compromise in the moderate center.

Comments are closed.