Home » Bill Seeks to Improve Diversity in Grand Juries and Increase Pay

Bill Seeks to Improve Diversity in Grand Juries and Increase Pay

by CC News
Assemblyman Chris Ward

A bill introduced by Assemblyman Chris Ward (D-Sand Diego) seeks to improve diversity on California grand jury panels and increase the pay.

If approved, the bill would seek to not only consider the geographic makeup of a particular county jury pool, but now also consider the demographics. His bill would require they include the gender, age, race and ethnicity during the grand jury selection process.

Currently under state law, grand juror’s are paid $15 a day. Under Ward’s bill, a juror will be paid equal to 70% of the county median daily income for each day’s attendance.

Here is the Press Release announcing the bill:

Assemblymember Ward Reintroduces Bill to Improve Diversity in Grand Juries

SACRAMENTO, CA – Grand juries are essential to holding local governments accountable throughout California’s 58 counties. However, the group of ordinary citizens that comprise them often lack racial and ethnic minorities to reflect a broad range of experience, expertise and perspectives.

Today, Assemblymember Chris Ward has introduced AB 78 to improve diversity within grand juries by increasing the per diem compensation and amending statutory requirements to allow the jury selection process to be able to attract a broader group of individuals.

“The people that serve on grand juries are largely volunteers and not always reflective of the communities they are representing,” said Assemblymember Ward (D-San Diego). “Ensuring that jurors are fairly compensated for their time while increasing transparency around the jury selection process will attract a more diverse pool of people to serve.”

Grand juries are administered through the California Superior Court and are treated as independent bodies. While current state statute requires jury commissioners to note the geographic makeup of a jury pool, there are no further requirements that would help judges create a more diverse grand jury based on race, gender age, or any other demographic characteristics.

Assemblymember Ward previously introduced AB 1972 to improve diversity within grand juries, but the bill did not advance through the Legislature. Assemblymember Ward introduced AB 78 to pick up where his previous bill left off and address this important issue.


According to the Bill:

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

 

AB 78, as introduced, Ward. Grand juries.
Under existing law, a grand jury is a body of the required number of persons chosen from the citizens of the county to serve before a court of competent jurisdiction, and sworn to inquire of public offenses that are committed or triable within the county. Existing law permits a grand jury to inquire into all public offenses committed or triable within the county and present them to the court by indictment. Existing law requires the fees for grand jurors to be $15 per each day’s attendance as a grand juror.
This bill would require that fee to be equal to 70% of the county median daily income for each day’s attendance. By increasing the fee for grand jurors, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
Existing law requires the superior court of each county to select grand jurors, as specified, and create a list of the persons selected to serve as grand jurors. Existing law requires the jury commissioner to file this list in the jury commissioner’s office and have the list published one time in a newspaper of general circulation. Existing law requires grand juries to be impaneled from this list. Existing law authorizes the presiding judge to name up to 10 jurors not previously named, who served on the previous grand jury and who consent to serve for a 2nd year on the grand jury.
This bill would require the list of grand jurors to contain the person’s gender, age, race or ethnicity, and residential ZIP Code or supervisorial district of the respective counties. The bill would require a separate list to be published in a newspaper containing each person’s name and the name of the judge who selected the jurors. The bill would require a list of specified prospective and impaneled jurors containing each person’s gender, age, race or ethnicity, and residential ZIP Code or supervisorial district to be published on an internet website, and would require that version of the list to not contain the person’s name. The bill would authorize the presiding judge to add up to 10 jurors from among the list of qualified jurors not selected in an effort to balance demographic diversity to reflect the general population of the county. The bill would require each court, on or before March 15, 2024, and on or before March 15 of each year thereafter, to provide the Judicial Council with the list and aggregate data of specified prospective and impaneled jurors containing the person’s gender, age, race or ethnicity, and residential ZIP Code or supervisorial district of the respective counties, as well as the name of the judge who selected each person. The bill would require the Judicial Council to, on or before June 15, 2024, and on or before June 15 of each year thereafter, report that information to the Legislature. The bill would additionally authorize summons for prospective jurors to include information on how to become a juror on a grand jury.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

 

You may also like

1 comment

Ray December 17, 2022 - 10:51 am

More trannies?

Comments are closed.