Home » Book Ban Bill Passes California State Assembly and Senate
California

Book Ban Bill Passes California State Assembly and Senate

by CC News
written by CC News
Book Ban

A bill that would ban book bans from school libraries and prohibit censorship or removal of books has moved onto Governor Gavin Newsom for signature.

SACRAMENTO, CA — Assembly Bill 1078, authored by Assemblymember Dr. Corey Jackson has achieved a significant milestone. The bill, designed to counteract book banning in California schools, successfully passed both the State Assembly and the State Senate.

AB 1078 now extends to cover school libraries, prohibiting any censorship or removal of books, instructional materials, or curriculum resource that state law requires be reflected in instructional materials.

“I am thrilled to see AB 1078 progressing through the legislative process, with these vital amendments enhancing its impact,” stated Assemblymember Dr. Corey Jackson. “We’re taking a firm stand against book banning in California’s schools, ensuring that our students have access to a broad range of educational materials that accurately represent the rich cultural and racial diversity of our society.”

AB 1078 now heads to the Governor’s desk for final approval. The bill’s passage in both legislative houses demonstrates California’s commitment to preserving academic freedom, fostering diverse perspectives, and discouraging the practice of book banning.

In response to AB 1078 passing both houses, Governor Newsom stated, “California is the true freedom state: a place where families — not political fanatics — have the freedom to decide what’s right for them. With the passage of this legislation that bans book bans and ensures all students have textbooks, our state’s Family Agenda is now even stronger. All students deserve the freedom to read and learn about the truth, the world, and themselves.”

Editors Note —

In June, the book ban bill was introduced in response to book banning in schools where Dr. Corey Jackson said in a press release, he took a bold stance against “rising tide of white Christian nationalist extremism to stop the banning of books in California’s classrooms”.

The Temecula Valley Unified School District garnered attention when its conservative school board majority blocked the adoption of a state-approved history textbook due to its mention of slain gay rights leader Harvey Milk in optional supporting materials. This decision not only stifles academic freedom but also perpetuates the exclusion of diverse perspectives from educational discourse. It is within this context that Assemblymember Dr. Corey Jackson is committed to putting an end to the banning of books and upholding the principles of inclusion and accuracy.

Assemblymember Dr. Corey Jackson believes that education should be a gateway to knowledge, empathy, and understanding. In this regard, Dr. Jackson states, “It is disheartening to witness the rise of white Christian nationalist extremism, which seeks to erase the invaluable contributions and narratives of marginalized communities. As a Christian myself, I am deeply appalled that these individuals are perverting our faith to sow division and suppress the histories of others. This will not happen on my watch. AB 1078 is a necessary response to protect our children’s access to diverse perspectives, encourage critical thinking, and promote inclusivity in our schools.”

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 1078, as amended, Jackson. Instructional materials and curriculum: diversity.
(1) Existing law, the Safe Place to Learn Act, requires the State Department of Education, as part of its regular monitoring and review of a local educational agency, to assess whether the local educational agency has, among other things, adopted a policy that prohibits discrimination, harassment, intimidation, and bullying based on specified protected characteristics.
This bill would require that policy to include a statement that the policy applies to all acts of the governing board or body of the local educational agency, the superintendent of the school district, and the county superintendent of schools in enacting policies and procedures that govern the local educational agency. Because this provision would impose an additional requirement on local educational agency officials, the bill would create a state-mandated local program.
The bill would require the department, as part of its regular monitoring and review of a local educational agency, to also assess whether the local educational agency has complied with state laws requiring public schools to provide pupils with comprehensive, culturally competent, and accurate instruction about the history, experiences, and viewpoints of people from different communities in California. program. The bill would require the department, no later than July 1, 2025, to develop guidance and public educational materials to ensure that all Californians can access information about educational laws and policies that safeguard the right to an accurate and inclusive curriculum.
(2) Existing law requires, as a condition of receipt of specified funds for instructional materials, the governing board of a school district to take specified actions, including holding a public hearing or hearings and making a determination, through a resolution, as to whether each pupil in each school in the school district has sufficient textbooks and instructional materials aligned to specified content standards. Upon a determination that there are insufficient textbooks or instructional materials, existing law requires the governing board to take action, as provided, to ensure that each pupil has sufficient textbooks or instructional materials within 2 months of the beginning of the school year in which the determination is made. If the county superintendent determines that a school does not have sufficient textbooks or instructional materials in accordance with this public hearing process, existing law requires the county superintendent to provide the school district with the opportunity to remedy the deficiency. If the deficiency is not remedied, existing law requires the county superintendent to request the department, with approval by the State Board of Education, to purchase textbooks or instructional materials for the school, as provided.
If a governing board of a school district makes the above-described determination, by resolution, that there are insufficient textbooks or instructional materials, this bill would require the governing board to submit a copy of that resolution to the county superintendent of schools no later than 3 business days after the governing board hearing.
(3) Existing law requires a school district to use its uniform complaint process to help identify and resolve any deficiencies related to, among other things, instructional materials, and to report summarized data on unresolved complaints to the county superintendent of schools. Existing law requires a complaint under these provisions to be filed with the principal of the school or the principal’s designee. Existing law requires the principal or the designee of the district superintendent to make all reasonable efforts to investigate any problem within their authority and to remedy a valid complaint within a reasonable time period, as specified. Existing law authorizes the complainant to appeal to the Superintendent of Public Instruction and requires the Superintendent to provide a written report to the state board describing the basis for the complaint and, as appropriate, a proposed remedy.
This bill would authorize a complaint regarding the sufficiency of textbooks or instructional materials that more than one pupil does not have sufficient textbooks or instructional materials, as a result of an act or omission by the governing board of a school district, to be filed directly with the Superintendent. The bill would authorize the Superintendent to directly intervene without waiting for the principal or the designee of the district superintendent to investigate.
(4) Existing law requires the governing board of each local educational agency to either provide for an audit of its books and accounts or make arrangements with the county superintendent to provide for that audit. Existing law requires the auditor’s report to include, among other things, a summary of audit exceptions and requires each county superintendent to review audit exceptions related to, among other things, inventory of equipment and the use of instructional materials program funds.
This bill would require a county superintendent of schools to take a range of actions if the county superintendent determines that there are insufficient textbooks or instructional materials pursuant to (A) the receipt of the above-described resolution related to insufficient textbooks or instructional materials from the governing board of a school district, (B) the receipt of the above-described report of an unresolved complaint related to instructional materials, or (C) the receipt of the above-described report related to an audit exception related to the inventory of equipment and the use of instructional materials program funds, as provided. The bill would require the county superintendent, upon making this determination, to provide the school district with the opportunity to remedy the deficiency by no later than the 2nd month of the school term. If the deficiency is not remedied, the bill would require the department to purchase textbooks or instructional materials for the school, as specified. The bill would require the funds necessary for the purchase to be considered a loan to the school district and, unless the loan is repaid based upon an agreed-upon schedule with the Superintendent, would require the Controller to deduct the amount of the loan from the school district’s next principal apportionment or other apportionment of state funds.

This bill would also require, if the deficiency in the provision of textbooks or instructional materials is not remedied, the county superintendent to prominently post a notice that the school district failed to provide pupils with sufficient textbooks or instructional materials on the homepage of the internet website of the county office of education. The bill would require the county superintendent to provide a copy of this notice to the district superintendent and the governing board of the school district, who would be required to prominently post the notice on the homepage of the internet website of the school district. If the governing board fails to take action to remedy the deficiency before the end of the 8th week of the school term, the bill would require these notices to prominently include the names of the individual members of the governing board of the school district.

By imposing new duties on county superintendents of schools, schools and county offices of education, and school districts, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(5) Existing law establishes a public school financing system that requires state funding for school districts, county offices of education, and charter schools to be calculated pursuant to a local control funding formula, as specified.
This bill would reduce a school district’s local control funding formula allocation by a specified amount if the Superintendent determines the school district has not provided sufficient textbooks or instructional materials pursuant to these provisions.
(6) Existing law requires instruction in social sciences to include a study of the role and contributions of men and women and culturally and racially diverse groups, including, among others, Mexican Americans and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Americans, and members of other ethnic and cultural groups.
This bill would revise the list of the above-described groups to instead require instruction in social sciences to include a study of the role and contributions of, among others, people of all genders, Latino Americans, LGBTQ+ Americans, and members of other ethnic, cultural, religious, and socioeconomic status groups. By imposing new obligations on local educational agencies, the bill would create a state-mandated local program.
(7) Existing law prescribes substantive requirements and particular processes that the State Board of Education, the Instructional Quality Commission, local educational agencies, and the Superintendent of Public Instruction are required to follow when adopting or evaluating instructional materials, as defined.
Existing law requires governing boards of school districts, when adopting instructional materials for use in the schools, to include materials that accurately portray the cultural and racial diversity of our society, including the contributions of both men and women and the role and contributions of culturally and racially diverse groups, including, among others, Mexican Americans, lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Americans, and members of other ethnic and cultural groups. Existing law requires the state board to comply with those requirements related to the accurate portrayal of cultural and racial diversity when reviewing and adopting or recommending for adoption submitted basic instructional materials. Existing law also requires the governing board of each school district maintaining one or more high schools to comply with those requirements related to the accurate portrayal of racial and cultural diversity when adopting instructional materials for use in the high schools under its control.
This bill would revise the list of the above-described culturally and racially diverse groups to instead include materials that accurately portray the contributions of people of all genders and the role and contributions of Latino Americans, LGBTQ+ Americans, and other ethnic, cultural, religious, and socioeconomic status groups. By imposing new obligations on local educational agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the department, no later than July 1, 2025, to issue guidance related to how to help school districts, county offices of education, charter schools, and school personnel manage conversations about race and gender, and how to review instructional materials to ensure that they represent diverse perspectives and are culturally relevant.
The bill would prohibit the governing board of a school district, a county board of education, or the governing body of a charter school from refusing to approve or prohibiting the use of any textbook, instructional material, or other curriculum or any book or other resource in a school library on the basis that it includes a study of the role and contributions of any individual or group consistent with the above-described requirements relating to instruction in social sciences and the adoption of instructional materials that accurately portray the cultural and racial diversity of our society. The bill would also prohibit the governing board of a school district or a county board of education from prohibiting the continued use of an existing appropriately adopted textbook, other instructional material, or curriculum that on the basis that it contains inclusive and diverse perspectives. The bill would prohibit the governing board of a school district or a county board of education from prohibiting the use of an existing textbook, other instructional material, or curriculum for any other reason unless the removal is approved by a 23 vote of the governing board. By imposing new obligations on school districts and county board of education, local educational agencies, the bill would create a state-mandated local program.
(8) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
(9) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
To see more California News, click here

Publisher of ContraCosta.news and host of several Podcast Shows focusing on Contra Costa County and State of California.

You may also like

Newsom Vetoes Bill Allowing Undocumented Immigrants Access to...

California State Parks Host California Coastal Cleanup Day

Former Teacher Sentenced to 120 Months for Trying...

SB 483: “Prone Restraints” Bill Advances to Governor’s...

AAA Survey Reveals American Driving Habits

AG Bonta Secures $3.9 Million Settlement with Cryptocurrency...

California Highway Patrol Arrest 1,100 People for DUI...

SB 1414: Bill to Increase Penalties for Child...

Legislature OKs Sen. Dodd’s Government Ethics Bill

California Bill Allows Undocumented Immigrants Access to Down...

1 comment

TSG September 8, 2023 - 12:40 pm

Perfect! Now the democrat pedos can unresistingly groom their prey.

Comments are closed.